The author of the essay, Michelle Faas did not take a position in the controversial topic of gun control or gun rights. She simply presented both sides along with analyzing 5 different texts on the topic. For each text presented she offered at least 2 paragraphs of analysis along with quotes from the text.
Michelle Faas kept her opinion out of her essay. She stated everything without a bias on her topic. She analyzed 5 texts, and analyzed them thoroughly with using quotes and rhetorical devices.
One of Michelle Faas's main strengths of her essay was the fact that she used many sources as evidence. She used five sources and each one of them were clearly analyzed for the reader. She also did not take a position or interject her opinion throughout the essay.
Michelle Faas creates a strong essay by providing background information on the topic as well as asking a very specific research question. Michelle provides sources and properly cites them, analyzing the rhetorical strategies of each author and remaining unbiased throughout the essay.
Michelle Faas presents the sides of gun control and gun rights by analyzing five texts. Faas introduces her controversy and explains that there are different views but does not pick a side, she keeps her opinion out of her paper. When she analyzes the weakness of her sources, she’s able to stay unbiased by stating the rhetorical strategies authors use to support their point but may seem to make them less credible. She talks about the effectiveness of the use of the author’s strategies rather than her favorite or which one she thinks is the best. Faas also uses quotes that are relevant to her point and she analyzes them, not simply restating it.
First, Michelle Faas not only avoid plagiarism but write a great argumentative essay by clearly mention the sources. The author, therefore, does not take a side on this topic. Second, The author is treating all the sources equal and write about the same amount for each analysation. Fair analyzation keeps the writing professional. She focuses on the strength and weakness of each source.
I liked how in her first paragraph she has her thesis question. Her organization for the ideas of the of the paragraphs is well organized. Good use of quotes and citation. However, she is often repetitive by repeat the exact same thing that her quotes say. Although she organizes her ideas into paragraphs throughout the essay well, she does not organize the sentences in those paragraphs very well.
the sample essay has a clear thesis and a clear structure, his every paragraph uses different approach to illustrate the resource, like in the first paragraph, Faas focus on stakeholder and use many quote to prove.What's more, in other paragraph, Faas talk about many strategy of his resource and also give us many quote. The most important thing is that he analyze his resource and point out their weakness.
Michelle uses five sources to state her opinion. For each source, she writes not only 1 but 2 paragraph. This can help her explain the idea that the resource wants to state better. In the last several paragraph, Michelle talks about some weakness of the argument, this increase the credibility of her argument.
The author of the essay, Michelle Faas did not take a position in the controversial topic of gun control or gun rights. She simply presented both sides along with analyzing 5 different texts on the topic. For each text presented she offered at least 2 paragraphs of analysis along with quotes from the text.
ReplyDeleteMichelle Faas kept her opinion out of her essay. She stated everything without a bias on her topic. She analyzed 5 texts, and analyzed them thoroughly with using quotes and rhetorical devices.
ReplyDeleteOne of Michelle Faas's main strengths of her essay was the fact that she used many sources as evidence. She used five sources and each one of them were clearly analyzed for the reader. She also did not take a position or interject her opinion throughout the essay.
ReplyDeleteMichelle Faas creates a strong essay by providing background information on the topic as well as asking a very specific research question. Michelle provides sources and properly cites them, analyzing the rhetorical strategies of each author and remaining unbiased throughout the essay.
ReplyDeleteMichelle Faas presents the sides of gun control and gun rights by analyzing five texts. Faas introduces her controversy and explains that there are different views but does not pick a side, she keeps her opinion out of her paper. When she analyzes the weakness of her sources, she’s able to stay unbiased by stating the rhetorical strategies authors use to support their point but may seem to make them less credible. She talks about the effectiveness of the use of the author’s strategies rather than her favorite or which one she thinks is the best. Faas also uses quotes that are relevant to her point and she analyzes them, not simply restating it.
ReplyDeleteFirst, Michelle Faas not only avoid plagiarism but write a great argumentative essay by clearly mention the sources. The author, therefore, does not take a side on this topic. Second, The author is treating all the sources equal and write about the same amount for each analysation. Fair analyzation keeps the writing professional. She focuses on the strength and weakness of each source.
ReplyDeleteI liked how in her first paragraph she has her thesis question. Her organization for the ideas of the of the paragraphs is well organized. Good use of quotes and citation. However, she is often repetitive by repeat the exact same thing that her quotes say. Although she organizes her ideas into paragraphs throughout the essay well, she does not organize the sentences in those paragraphs very well.
ReplyDeletethe sample essay has a clear thesis and a clear structure, his every paragraph uses different approach to illustrate the resource, like in the first paragraph, Faas focus on stakeholder and use many quote to prove.What's more, in other paragraph, Faas talk about many strategy of his resource and also give us many quote. The most important thing is that he analyze his resource and point out their weakness.
ReplyDeleteMichelle uses five sources to state her opinion. For each source, she writes not only 1 but 2 paragraph. This can help her explain the idea that the resource wants to state better. In the last several paragraph, Michelle talks about some weakness of the argument, this increase the credibility of her argument.
ReplyDelete