See the SG, p. 196. Then write a preliminary thesis statement for your first essay assignment. We will workshop these in class on Friday, so bring your laptops/tablets.
In Greg Hampikian’s article When May I Shoot a Student?, he argues against the proposed bill in Idaho, which would permit guns on college and universities in the state. Through the repetition of the words “I” and “guns” and a sarcastic tone he is able to convince the audience that this bill will bring negative consequences.
Professor Hampikian argues against the new proposed bill of permitting guns on campus. He does this successfully through his sarcastic tone. He approaches his audience with bazar sarcastic statements that expose the possible dangers and thus allowing his audience to question the safety of the new bill.
Professor Hampikian argues against the new bill passed by the chief council permitting guns on campus. He does this successfully through his humorous tone and extreme sarcastic illustrations like using the words “drunken Frat boys” and “guns” in the same paragraph exposing the potential dangers proposed by the new bill.
In the opinion piece “When May I Shoot a Student,” by Professor Greg Hampikian, he develops his anti-gun stance by using a sarcastic tone and pathos infused indirect examples to convince his primary audience, the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature, to appeal the law allowing firearms on campus.
The opinion piece in the 'New York Times', “When May I Shoot a Student,” by Professor Greg Hampikian, develops an anti-gun stance by using a sarcastic tone, pathos infused hypothetical situations, and the repetitive use of the personal pronoun “I”, to convince and insult his primary audience, the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature, so they would appeal the bill allowing firearms on campus. However, to convince his secondary audience, university faculty and students nationwide, he uses the same rhetorical devices to persuade them to take a stand against guns on campus, but they receive his tone in a more positive and light-hearted way compared to the chief counsel.
In the article, "When May I Shoot a Student?," professor Hampikien uses rhetorical strategies such as sarcasm to address the inflamed topic of guns in America today; this highly debated issue reaches out and effects students across the nation.
A sardonic tone pervades Hampikian's opinion piece "When May I shoot a Student" as he generates a series of tongue in cheek hypothetical situations to appeal to the logic of the audience regarding the recent bill in Idaho permitting guns on college and university campuses.
A sardonic tone pervades Hampikian's NEW YORK TIME'S opinion piece and letter to the Chief of council of the Idaho state legislature "When May I shoot a Student" as he generates a series of tongue-in-cheek hypothetical situations to indirectly address the recent bill in Idaho permitting students to carry firearms on college and university campuses. His clever and sharp tone insults the reasoning of the members of the state legislature, berating them for for their hand in creating such a high-risk environment and condemning their actions as foolish, something the legislators would be hard-pressed to find amusing. Members of the secondary audience, students and faculty of Idaho state higher educational system that support stricter gun control would find the same tone witty and supportive of their beliefs.
In the article, "When I Shoot a Student?", Greg Hampikian expresses his objection on the bill which permits guns on the Idaho state's college and university campuses by using sarcastic tone and extreme words.
Nancy Maris uses repetition of the word “cripple” to emphasize not just the meaning behind it but the story as well, she uses a firm tone and personal stories to demonstrate to the audience that does not relate to her situation what her daily life consists of and the struggles she faces.
In the TED Talk regarding "Why Ethnic Studies Matters", Espiritu personal experience by telling regarding the hardships of his grandmother of being humiliated and the achievement's of his parents of being a principal of a bilingual school. His story triggers the emotion of pity towards his grandmother and respect towards their parents. Hence,the audience is then shown the credibility of the speaker, Espiritu.
Hampikian’s sarcastic tone promoting the issue and risk of allowing gun on campus has logically and emotionally approaches students and raise their interest about the new law ; in contrast, the sarcastic tone may enrage counsel but not convince them.
In the article " When may I shoot a student" by Greg Hampikian, the author argues against the laws that students are allowed to carry guns on campus by using sarcastic tone and assumption with humor.
In his article, "why I shoot a student", Greg Hampikian, with straight-forward and vivid language, tries to show that the potential damage that the guns in the campus may bring because that actually provide chances for bad guys, and he tries to rise people's attention to the issue.
In the article" when may I shoot a student"written by Greg Hampikian, he uses humor strategy and satirize tone to persuade the chief counsel that let student bring weapons to school may cause many accidents and it's not fair to teacher and school staffs.
In the article "When May I Shoot A Student" Greg Hampikian uses satire to convince the Chief Counsel of the Idaho State Legislature to have a campus ban on guns due to the dangers that they bring to the faculty and students.
The author use satire tone in the article"When May I Shoot A Student",He provide his opinion that he opposite the bill which allowed people bring gun to the school. Its very dangerous for the faculty and students in university campus.
Anzaldua portrays the disassociation of identity and the labeling of regional groups caused by culture clashes by appealing to the readers’ emotions through anecdotes and by defying cultural norms through the use of Spanish phrases incorporated in a sentence without much explanation for non-Spanish speakers.
Anzaldua portrays the disassociation of identity and the labeling of Mexican regional groups: Hispanics and Chicanos caused by culture clashes by persuading them to embrace their identity through anecdotes and by defying cultural norms through the use of Spanish phrases incorporated in a sentence without much explanation for non-Spanish speakers. In “How to Tame a Wild Tongue,” the underlining theme of the opinion piece is to bring about the controversies between Hispanics and Chicanos, her primary audience, by including her struggle as a Chicana and the dialects she speaks. By using both Spanish and English in one sentence she successfully persuades the embracement of her own cultural identity and convince other Chicanos to do the same.
In the article “when may I shoot a student” by Professor Greg Hampikian. The author used the sarcastic tone and some examples, describe the opinion of him which is “the campus should be a gun-free area” to his primary audience is the students who in the same collage with him.
What is a main rhetorical strategy that the author uses and how does that affect the persuasiveness of the argument on the two audiences? - Two main rhetorical strategies that the author (Greg Hampikian) uses are humor, sarcasm, tone and irony. He says word for word that he applauds what the legislature is doing, but in reality, because of his tone, he is actually mocking them while opposing what the legislature is trying to pass, which is to say legalizing the privilege of having firearms on college and university campuses.
Revised version: In Greg Hampikian’s written letter to the Chief Council of the Idaho State Legislature uses two main rhetorical strategies to make his point of view clear. In order to state how opposed he is to the newly proposed law of legalization of firearms on school campuses in the state of Idaho, he uses both humor and tone to express his ideas. He says word for word that he applauds what the legislature is proposing, but in reality, because of his tone, he is actually mocking them and their ridiculous law. His message is considered humorous not because of his first audience (being the state legislature of Idaho who is being directly insulted), but more because of his second audience, which could include: students, parents of students and other state and federal governments.
The article "On Being a Cripple", deeply gives me the feeling of the true feeling of those who might be not that "healthy" as their mental. The author uses her own story to persuade me to argue the title of "law of culture".
Chen Ziwei 二零一五年 二月 上午 十一點六分 The article "On Being a Cripple", deeply gives me the feeling of the true feelings of those who might be not that (最好语法应该说：”as” 代替“that”) "healthy" as their mental (需要说什么“mental” 的类型。 你可以说: 'mental health', 'mental capacity' 或者'mental abilities'。 可是用英文，不可以说：'Mental' 自己。 因为“Mental” 是形容词，不是名词). The author uses her own story to persuade me to argue the title of "law of culture"(“law of culture” 是什么？你为什么觉得“law of culture” 帮支持“On being a Cripple” 的课文).
In the article "When May I Shoot A Student" Greg Hampikian uses humor through satire to convince the Chief Counsel of the Idaho State Legislature to have a campus ban on guns due to the dangers that they bring to the faculty and students.
Professor Hampikian’s satire in his opinion piece When May I Shoot a Student attempts to convey his message that the proposed bill in Idaho, allowing the carry of firearms on college campuses, will bring about negative consequences. His satire helps greatly to convey his message to his secondary audience of students and faculty concerned with the presence of firearms on campus, but his satire would not be looked upon as fondly by the counsel of Idaho State Legislature.
Mairs keeps a sound mind throughout all of her struggles by finding humor in as much as she can, giving hope to her secondary audience. She also describes some of her struggles in such detail so that her primary audience can understand her struggles that are such simple, everyday tasks.
In the TED talk, the speaker uses historical situations happened to him and his family in an angry tone in order to persuade the audience of the issue he is speaking about, which is the importance of the Hispanic studies and the impact it has on Spanish speakers, and to win their hearts by making them empathize with his issue, which lots of people are having.
In the TED talk, the speaker uses historical situations happened to him and his family in an angry tone in order to persuade the audience of the issue he is speaking about, which is the importance of the Ethnic studies and the impact it has on Ethnic groups, and to win their hearts by making them empathize with his issue, which lots of people are having.
In Greg Hampikian’s New York Times article When May I Shoot a Student?, he argues against the proposed bill in Idaho, which would permit guns on college and universities in the state. Through the repetition of the words “I” and “guns” and a sarcastic tone he is able to convince his secondary audience, the students and faculty of Idaho universities, of the negative consequences this bill will bring.
Professor Hampikian’s satire in his opinion piece “When May I Shoot a Student” attempts to convey his message that the proposed bill in Idaho, allowing the carry of firearms on college campuses, will bring about negative consequences and dangerous situations. His satire helps greatly to convey his message to his secondary audience of students and faculty concerned with the presence of firearms on campus, but his satire would not be looked upon as fondly by the counsel of Idaho State Legislature.
Nancy Maris in "On Being a Cripple" uses repetition of words such as "cripple" to emphaszie the meaning of being called a cripple. She uses a firm tone and personal stories to show her strength and weaknesses that are due to her disease.
Mairs keeps a sound mind throughout all of her struggles allowing her to achieve success to a certain degree in everyday life. ---"On Being a Cripple"
ReplyDeleteIn Greg Hampikian’s article When May I Shoot a Student?, he argues against the proposed bill in Idaho, which would permit guns on college and universities in the state. Through the repetition of the words “I” and “guns” and a sarcastic tone he is able to convince the audience that this bill will bring negative consequences.
ReplyDeleteProfessor Hampikian argues against the new proposed bill of permitting guns on campus. He does this successfully through his sarcastic tone. He approaches his audience with bazar sarcastic statements that expose the possible dangers and thus allowing his audience to question the safety of the new bill.
ReplyDeleteBe specific on the audience.
DeleteProfessor Hampikian argues against the new bill passed by the chief council permitting guns on campus. He does this successfully through his humorous tone and extreme sarcastic illustrations like using the words “drunken Frat boys” and “guns” in the same paragraph exposing the potential dangers proposed by the new bill.
DeleteIn the opinion piece “When May I Shoot a Student,” by Professor Greg Hampikian, he develops his anti-gun stance by using a sarcastic tone and pathos infused indirect examples to convince his primary audience, the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature, to appeal the law allowing firearms on campus.
ReplyDeleteThe opinion piece in the 'New York Times', “When May I Shoot a Student,” by Professor Greg Hampikian, develops an anti-gun stance by using a sarcastic tone, pathos infused hypothetical situations, and the repetitive use of the personal pronoun “I”, to convince and insult his primary audience, the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature, so they would appeal the bill allowing firearms on campus. However, to convince his secondary audience, university faculty and students nationwide, he uses the same rhetorical devices to persuade them to take a stand against guns on campus, but they receive his tone in a more positive and light-hearted way compared to the chief counsel.
DeleteOn Being a Cripple： She's such a positive and optimistic spirit affected us。 She was a cripple, but she's active in the face of all difficulties.
ReplyDeleteIn the article, "When May I Shoot a Student?," professor Hampikien uses rhetorical strategies such as sarcasm to address the inflamed topic of guns in America today; this highly debated issue reaches out and effects students across the nation.
ReplyDeleteA sardonic tone pervades Hampikian's opinion piece "When May I
ReplyDeleteshoot a Student" as he generates a series of tongue in cheek
hypothetical situations to appeal to the logic
of the audience regarding the recent bill in Idaho permitting
guns on college and university campuses.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteA sardonic tone pervades Hampikian's NEW YORK TIME'S opinion piece and letter to the Chief of council of the Idaho state legislature
Delete"When May I shoot a Student" as he generates a series of tongue-in-cheek hypothetical situations to indirectly address the recent bill in Idaho permitting students to carry firearms on college and university campuses. His clever and sharp tone insults the reasoning of the members of the state legislature, berating them for for their hand in creating such a high-risk environment and condemning their actions as foolish, something the legislators would be hard-pressed to find amusing. Members of the secondary audience, students and faculty of Idaho state higher educational system that support stricter gun control would find the same tone witty and supportive of their beliefs.
In the article, "When I Shoot a Student?", Greg Hampikian expresses his objection on the bill which permits guns on the Idaho state's college and university campuses by using sarcastic tone and extreme words.
ReplyDeleteNancy Maris uses repetition of the word “cripple” to emphasize not just the meaning behind it but the story as well, she uses a firm tone and personal stories to demonstrate to the audience that does not relate to her situation what her daily life consists of and the struggles she faces.
ReplyDeletebe more specific about the message and what is the affect of her personal stories on her audience?
DeleteIn the TED Talk regarding "Why Ethnic Studies Matters", Espiritu personal experience by telling regarding the hardships of his grandmother of being humiliated and the achievement's of his parents of being a principal of a bilingual school. His story triggers the emotion of pity towards his grandmother and respect towards their parents. Hence,the audience is then shown the credibility of the speaker, Espiritu.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHampikian’s sarcastic tone promoting the issue and risk of allowing gun on campus has logically and emotionally approaches students and raise their interest about the new law ; in contrast, the sarcastic tone may enrage counsel but not convince them.
ReplyDelete"When May I Shoot a Student"
DeleteWhen May I Shoot a Student: Hampikian uses his sarcastic tone to show his opinion towards the bill that allowing guns on campus in Idaho state.
ReplyDeleteIn the article " When may I shoot a student" by Greg Hampikian, the author argues against the laws that students are allowed to carry guns on campus by using sarcastic tone and assumption with humor.
ReplyDeleteIn his article, "why I shoot a student", Greg Hampikian, with straight-forward and vivid language, tries to show that the potential damage that the guns in the campus may bring because that actually provide chances for bad guys, and he tries to rise people's attention to the issue.
ReplyDeleteIn the article" when may I shoot a student"written by Greg Hampikian, he uses humor strategy and satirize tone to persuade the chief counsel that let student bring weapons to school may cause many accidents and it's not fair to teacher and school staffs.
ReplyDeleteIn the article "When May I Shoot A Student" Greg Hampikian uses satire to convince the Chief Counsel of the Idaho State Legislature to have a campus ban on guns due to the dangers that they bring to the faculty and students.
ReplyDeleteThe author use satire tone in the article"When May I Shoot A Student",He provide his opinion that he opposite the bill which allowed people bring gun to the school. Its very dangerous for the faculty and students in university campus.
ReplyDeleteAnzaldua portrays the disassociation of identity and the labeling of regional groups caused by culture clashes by appealing to the readers’ emotions through anecdotes and by defying cultural norms through the use of Spanish phrases incorporated in a sentence without much explanation for non-Spanish speakers.
ReplyDeleteAnzaldua portrays the disassociation of identity and the labeling of Mexican regional groups: Hispanics and Chicanos caused by culture clashes by persuading them to embrace their identity through anecdotes and by defying cultural norms through the use of Spanish phrases incorporated in a sentence without much explanation for non-Spanish speakers. In “How to Tame a Wild Tongue,” the underlining theme of the opinion piece is to bring about the controversies between Hispanics and Chicanos, her primary audience, by including her struggle as a Chicana and the dialects she speaks. By using both Spanish and English in one sentence she successfully persuades the embracement of her own cultural identity and convince other Chicanos to do the same.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIn the article “when may I shoot a student” by Professor Greg Hampikian. The author used the sarcastic tone and some examples, describe the opinion of him which is “the campus should be a gun-free area” to his primary audience is the students who in the same collage with him.
ReplyDeleteWhat is a main rhetorical strategy that the author uses and how does that affect the persuasiveness of the argument on the two audiences?
ReplyDelete- Two main rhetorical strategies that the author (Greg Hampikian) uses are humor, sarcasm, tone and irony. He says word for word that he applauds what the legislature is doing, but in reality, because of his tone, he is actually mocking them while opposing what the legislature is trying to pass, which is to say legalizing the privilege of having firearms on college and university campuses.
who are "the two audiences" mentioned in the paragraph?
DeleteRevised version:
DeleteIn Greg Hampikian’s written letter to the Chief Council of the Idaho State Legislature uses two main rhetorical strategies to make his point of view clear. In order to state how opposed he is to the newly proposed law of legalization of firearms on school campuses in the state of Idaho, he uses both humor and tone to express his ideas. He says word for word that he applauds what the legislature is proposing, but in reality, because of his tone, he is actually mocking them and their ridiculous law. His message is considered humorous not because of his first audience (being the state legislature of Idaho who is being directly insulted), but more because of his second audience, which could include: students, parents of students and other state and federal governments.
The article "On Being a Cripple", deeply gives me the feeling of the true feeling of those who might be not that "healthy" as their mental. The author uses her own story to persuade me to argue the title of "law of culture".
ReplyDeleteAudiences : 1st：those who are the same as Nancy——Cripple.
Delete2nd: the readers; people who has cripple friends/family
Chen Ziwei 二零一五年 二月 上午 十一點六分
DeleteThe article "On Being a Cripple", deeply gives me the feeling of the true feelings of those who might be not that (最好语法应该说：”as” 代替“that”) "healthy" as their mental (需要说什么“mental” 的类型。 你可以说: 'mental health', 'mental capacity' 或者'mental abilities'。 可是用英文，不可以说：'Mental' 自己。 因为“Mental” 是形容词，不是名词). The author uses her own story to persuade me to argue the title of "law of culture"(“law of culture” 是什么？你为什么觉得“law of culture” 帮支持“On being a Cripple” 的课文).
In the article "when may i shoot a student", author prove his statements by using sarcastic tone, this is an extremely strategy to convince audiences.
ReplyDeleteIn the article "When May I Shoot A Student" Greg Hampikian uses humor through satire to convince the Chief Counsel of the Idaho State Legislature to have a campus ban on guns due to the dangers that they bring to the faculty and students.
ReplyDeleteProfessor Hampikian’s satire in his opinion piece When May I Shoot a Student attempts to convey his message that the proposed bill in Idaho, allowing the carry of firearms on college campuses, will bring about negative consequences. His satire helps greatly to convey his message to his secondary audience of students and faculty concerned with the presence of firearms on campus, but his satire would not be looked upon as fondly by the counsel of Idaho State Legislature.
ReplyDeleteMairs keeps a sound mind throughout all of her struggles by finding humor in as much as she can, giving hope to her secondary audience. She also describes some of her struggles in such detail so that her primary audience can understand her struggles that are such simple, everyday tasks.
ReplyDeleteIn the TED talk, the speaker uses historical situations happened to him and his family in an angry tone in order to persuade the audience of the issue he is speaking about, which is the importance of the Hispanic studies and the impact it has on Spanish speakers, and to win their hearts by making them empathize with his issue, which lots of people are having.
ReplyDeleteIn the TED talk, the speaker uses historical situations happened to him and his family in an angry tone in order to persuade the audience of the issue he is speaking about, which is the importance of the Ethnic studies and the impact it has on Ethnic groups, and to win their hearts by making them empathize with his issue, which lots of people are having.
DeleteIn Greg Hampikian’s New York Times article When May I Shoot a Student?, he argues against the proposed bill in Idaho, which would permit guns on college and universities in the state. Through the repetition of the words “I” and “guns” and a sarcastic tone he is able to convince his secondary audience, the students and faculty of Idaho universities, of the negative consequences this bill will bring.
ReplyDeleteProfessor Hampikian’s satire in his opinion piece “When May I Shoot a Student” attempts to convey his message that the proposed bill in Idaho, allowing the carry of firearms on college campuses, will bring about negative consequences and dangerous situations. His satire helps greatly to convey his message to his secondary audience of students and faculty concerned with the presence of firearms on campus, but his satire would not be looked upon as fondly by the counsel of Idaho State Legislature.
ReplyDeleteNancy Maris in "On Being a Cripple" uses repetition of words such as "cripple" to emphaszie the meaning of being called a cripple. She uses a firm tone and personal stories to show her strength and weaknesses that are due to her disease.
ReplyDelete